Mais uma golpada no mundo das vacinas, depois de vos ter apresentado em primeira mão, este PDF, que é algo mais do que apenas sugestivo, temos agora dois virologistas da gigante farmacêutica Merck que resolveram chegar-se à frente pondo uma queixa contra a companhia farmacêutica para a qual trabalhavam por falsificação dos resultados da vacina contra a papeira (mumps), usando diversos métodos laboratoriais para esse efeito. Um caso perfeito de embuste cientifico.
http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/06/27/47851.htm
Merck has known for a decade that its mumps vaccine is "far less effective" than it tells the government, and it falsified test results and sold millions of doses of "questionable efficacy," flooding and monopolizing the market, a primary caregiver claims in a federal antitrust class action.
Alabama-based Chatom Primary Care sued Merck on Monday, the week after the unsealing of a False Claims Act complaint two relators filed in 2010.
Those relators, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, were Merck virologists who claim in their unsealed complaint that they "witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine's efficacy findings."
Se esta escumalha falsifica resultados, imaginem o que não escondem sobre os efeitos secundários. Pertencem a uma liga de crime organizado, legalmente aceite e incentivado por quem é financiado pelos gangues, não é só a Merck.
Krahling and Wlochowski claimed Merck's scheme caused the United States to pay "hundreds of millions of dollars for a vaccine that does not provide adequate immunization."
E será que não fazem isto com todas? Ou será que nas outras são idóneas, responsáveis e apresentam os resultados reais?
"As the largest single purchaser of childhood vaccines (accounting for more than 50 percent of all vaccine purchases), the United States is by far the largest financial victim of Merck's fraud," according to the 2010 False Claims Act complaint.
"But the ultimate victims here are the millions of children who every year are being injected with a mumps vaccine that is not providing them with an adequate level of protection. And while this is a disease that, according to the Centers for Disease Control ('CDC'), was supposed to be eradicated by now, the failure in Merck's vaccine has allowed this disease to linger, with significant outbreaks continuing to occur."
Estas crianças que estão vacinadas quando apanham o vírus natural a resposta do seu sistema imunológico será igual à de um miúdo que não esteja vacinado.
Cada vez que existe uma epidemia seja com sarampo, papeira, ou um outro vírus "de infância", o que se detecta é que mais de 60% dos miúdos infectados estão com as vacinas em dia. É claro que estas várias despistagens às doenças não é aplicável em Portugal, confia-se sempre no boletim de vacinas.
Starting in the late 1990s, Merck set out on its sham testing program with the objective of "report[ing] efficacy of 95 percent or higher regardless of the vaccine's true efficacy," the complaint states.
Chatom says Merck initially called its testing program Protocol 007.
Under Protocol 007, Merck did not test the vaccine's ability to protect children against a "wild-type" mumps virus, which is "the type of real-life virus against which vaccines are generally tested," the complaint states.
Instead, Chatom says, Merck tested children's blood using its own attenuated strain of the virus.
Uma coisa é inserir nas crianças o vírus atenuado contido nas vacinas e obter os anticorpos necessários, outra coisa é esses anticorpos actuarem numa resposta imunológica à variante natural desse vírus, o que raramente acontece, tal como é dito em cima e se demonstra aqui.
"This was the same mumps strain with which the children were vaccinated," the complaint states.
That "subverted" the purpose of the testing regime, "which was to measure the vaccine's ability to provide protection against a disease-causing mumps virus that a child would actually face in real life. The end result of this deviation ... was that Merck's test overstated the vaccine's effectiveness," Chatom claims.
Merck also added animal antibodies to blood samples to achieve more favorable test results, though it knew that the human immune system would never produce such antibodies, and that the antibodies created a laboratory testing scenario that "did not in any way correspond to, correlate with, or represent real life ... virus neutralization in vaccinated people," according to the complaint.
Isto é demais, para mostrarem que a vacina era pujante adicionavam anticorpos de animais às amostras de sangue, sabendo eles na perfeição que nós (humanos) nunca conseguiríamos produzir esses mesmos anticorpos. E há quem chame a isto de ciência.
Chatom claims that the falsification of test results occurred "with the knowledge, authority and approval of Merck's senior management."
And as Merck's vaccine is the only game in town, the vaccine's "significantly degraded" quality means "there has remained a significant risk of a resurgence of mumps outbreaks," Chatom says in its complaint.
It claims that the degraded quality of the Merck vaccine played a role in a 2006 mumps outbreak in the Midwest, and in another outbreak in 2009.
São estas as companhias farmacêuticas que sentam-se na mesa da OMS? Onde todos se mostram preocupados com a nossa saúde? Dá mesmo para confiar os nossos filhos a esta malta?
http://www.examiner.com/article/u-s-mumps-outbreak-after-two-vaccine-doses-89-still-contracted-disease
An outbreak of mumps in the United States between 2009 and 2010 occurred mostly in children who had been vaccinated, according to a study published today in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). During the outbreak, 3,502 cases were reported over a one-year period.
Researchers from the involved state health departments and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention studied 1,648 of those cases. The researchers found that 89 percent had received the recommended two doses of mumps vaccine. The outbreak was traced to one of the camp partcipants, an 11-year-old boy who also received two doses of the mumps vaccine.
Isto é uma paródia das grandes, mas é óbvio que eles sabem que as vacinas estão contaminadas por falta de eficácia, sabem também que têm de administrar dezenas "delas" de modo a gerar mais dinheiro com mais pandemias, é a pura ganância à custa das crianças sob o designio de ciência.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário